Translate

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia - The Walls Of Jericho Are Fallen [10/...

 



Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia on Critical Mass Radio recorded on October 21, 2014
The Walls Of Jericho Are Fallen

"NAME: The master key to the entire system’s/CROWN CORPORATION’S game. The NAME is the lynch pin to the entire legal/control construct. Without a LEGAL NAME, which is your consent by agreeing to be said NAME, the system vampires cannot literally feed on your life blood/creation source energy that is typically shown in the physical materials we collect. It is only the CONSENT to be/use/have a LEGAL NAME/Mark of the Beast that is required for your absolute spiritual contract/deal with the devil motif to be in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT with you as a SLAVE and them as MASTER. For PROOF of this, look and see how much of your life/existence involves a LEGAL NAME and you will see the measure of control the system has over you."

"We are clearing this reality of these parasites exponentially now where universal law reigns supreme where none shall or can trespass. They are masters of deception so do not let your loving compassion be used against you, something that has been their most powerful tools. The bio-borg entities are already lifeless and are dependent only on being able to suck the life out of you but, like every vampire, they cannot enter your reality without an invitation. Every use of the legal NAME is the only invitation they need so best cut your ties and consent with that. Just get this concept and you have already cut the puppet strings and your causal ability returns instantly in relation to your ability to be responsible with that ultimate of powers.
To the “walking dead” (and you know what you are) , your time is over, your deceptions are powerless and now moment by now moment, you are being erased from consciousness for the invading parasites you are. We, of the living soul, are awake, aware and reclaiming our reality where yours never existed. In short, yes, you are doomed. Have a nice day!"
- Babylon Is Fallen (Excerpt) 

Ukraine: Polizei nimmt Herausgeber von Oppositions-Zeitung fest | DEUTSCHE WIRTSCHAFTS NACHRICHTEN

Ukraine: Polizei nimmt Herausgeber von Oppositions-Zeitung fest | DEUTSCHE WIRTSCHAFTS NACHRICHTEN

Der Herausgeber einer ukrainischen Oppositions-Zeitung wurde festgenommen. Ihm wird Unterstützung für eine Terror-Organisation vorgeworfen. Anfang September wurden in der Ukraine 15 russischsprachige TV-Kanäle verboten. Zudem ist es im Zuge des aktuellen Wahlkampfs zu mehreren Anschlägen gekommen.
Am Sonntag wird in der Ukraine ein neues Parlament gewählt. (Foto: dpa)
Am Sonntag wird in der Ukraine ein neues Parlament gewählt. (Foto: dpa)
Am Mittwoch haben ukrainische Sicherheitsbeamte in Odessa den Herausgeber der Online-Zeitung „Info Center“, Eugene Anokhin, festgenommen. Ihm wird Unterstützung und Beherbergung einer terroristischen Organisation vorgeworfen, berichtet timer.od.ua. Das „Info Center“ gilt in den Augen der Regierung als Oppositions-Plattform, die den Separatisten nahe steht.
Anfang September hat die Regierung in Kiew ein Sendeverbot für 15 russischsprachige Kanäle ausgesprochen. Darunter fallen unter anderem Russia-24, Russia Today, Russia-1, Life News, Star, Petersburg-5, meldet Ukrinform.
Am Montag fand ein Bombenanschlag gegen den Parlaments-Kandidaten der Volksfront, Wladimir Borisenko, statt. Der Berater im ukrainischen Ministerium des Innern, Anton Gerashchenko, bestätigte den Vorfall. Vergangene Woche wurde der Regisseur Mark Gres von Unbekannten auf offener Straße angegriffen und schwer verletzt, meldet MigNews.
Er befand sich auf dem Nachhause-Weg und war zuvor im Fernsehen aufgetreten. Gres ist Stellvertreter des Chefs der Radikalen Partei, Oleg Lyashko, und kandidiert für das ukrainische Parlament.

CROWN COPYRIGHT SOURCE DOC OWNERSHIP! Please TRUTHERS- JEFF C, TATOOT, ET AL- THEY OWN YOUR A##!




The LIE is so BIG, you can't believe it. But it is the absolute truth! 

Everywhere, wherever we cast our eyes, we find forced upon our attention the unnatural and injurious effects of unregulated private corporations and corporate governments who fill their bellies with the labor and death of the very bodies that they have placed into service from birth. Service to self, and service for their gluttony where enough is never enough.

You see fraud everywhere but the truth is you were born into Fraud. The first crime committed by the ones who claim to protect us, while you are defenseless; is slavery at it’s finest where the slaves never know they are slaves. Most of humanity dies without ever knowing this most heinous crime was committed upon them. What is that crime?

They con your parents and the parents before them into selling you and every infant over to a life of servitude. 
For just a moment please feel the depth of this most heinous crime.


CROWN PDF- http://www.opsi.gov.uk/advice/crown-c...

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=...
losethename.com
http://kateofgaia.wordpress.com/kates...

Japan: Sakurajima eruption sends ash plume 4.5 km into air

 


Following a week of relatively low activity, Japanese Sakurajima volcano (Showa crater/Aira caldera) has become more active again during the past days.
A particularly strong vulcanian explosion occurred this morning (October 24) and produced an ash plume that rose up to 4 500 m (15 000 ft) altitude.
JMA reported that three explosions from Showa crater ejected tephra as far as 1 300 m during October 14 - 17. The Alert Level remained at 3 (on a scale of 1 - 5).
The Tokyo VAAC reported that on October 16, 18 and 21 ash plumes rose to altitudes of 1.8 - 3 km (6 000 - 10 000 ft) a.s.l. and drifted S, SE, and NE.  

Athens flood: Heavy rains bring chaos to Greece capital

 



Roads became rivers in parts of the Greek capital Athens on Friday after the region was hit by torrential rain which swept away cars and damaged homes and businesses.

Friday, October 24, 2014

Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia - Sergeant Returns Truck To Janet [10/...

 



Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia + GNIP Discussion Group on Critical Mass Radio recorded on October 22, 2014
Guests: Janet, Kathy, Mark, Brandon
Sergeant Returns Truck To Janet

"NAME: The master key to the entire system’s/CROWN CORPORATION’S game. The NAME is the lynch pin to the entire legal/control construct. Without a LEGAL NAME, which is your consent by agreeing to be said NAME, the system vampires cannot literally feed on your life blood/creation source energy that is typically shown in the physical materials we collect. It is only the CONSENT to be/use/have a LEGAL NAME/Mark of the Beast that is required for your absolute spiritual contract/deal with the devil motif to be in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT with you as a SLAVE and them as MASTER. For PROOF of this, look and see how much of your life/existence involves a LEGAL NAME and you will see the measure of control the system has over you."

"We are clearing this reality of these parasites exponentially now where universal law reigns supreme where none shall or can trespass. They are masters of deception so do not let your loving compassion be used against you, something that has been their most powerful tools. The bio-borg entities are already lifeless and are dependent only on being able to suck the life out of you but, like every vampire, they cannot enter your reality without an invitation. Every use of the legal NAME is the only invitation they need so best cut your ties and consent with that. Just get this concept and you have already cut the puppet strings and your causal ability returns instantly in relation to your ability to be responsible with that ultimate of powers.
To the “walking dead” (and you know what you are) , your time is over, your deceptions are powerless and now moment by now moment, you are being erased from consciousness for the invading parasites you are. We, of the living soul, are awake, aware and reclaiming our reality where yours never existed. In short, yes, you are doomed. Have a nice day!"
- Babylon Is Fallen (Excerpt) 

Controlled Opposition and Ebola Exposed | Farm Wars

Controlled Opposition and Ebola Exposed | Farm Wars

Hegelian Dialectic
Barbara H. Peterson
There are several theories regarding the Ebola issue on the net. In this article, I will discuss two of them.
  1. Ebola is here, and the government is downplaying its severity and letting infected people come to the U.S. to implement population reduction.
  2. The severity of the Ebola situation is a hoax, designed to implement a vaccination protocol and restrict our movements due to the threat of a pandemic outbreak.
Both theories are espoused by well known alternative media personalities. And both are polar opposites.
So, which is the most reasonable? Which makes the most sense? And which one just might be controlled opposition?
Theory 1
This theory espouses the belief that the government (CDC) is inept, and downplaying the severity of the threat in order to spread the disease to reduce the population.
Sounds reasonable enough, right? Yes, the government is inept, and the CDC is most likely lying. But downplaying the severity of the threat? Haven’t we seen mainstream media broadcast fear porn all over the networks lately while the CDC runs around in hazmat suits and a new and experimental genetically engineered vaccine is being rushed into production as I type? Downplaying? Seriously?
That my friends, is a big, fat red flag. Something is simply not right with this theory.
I see certain alternative media sites running like their pants are on fire attempting to strike as much fear in the hearts of their readers regarding the Ebola outbreak as they can, with a “buy this” link attached. Help! Help! Ebola is here! Buy this! Buy that! The government is lying to us! They want to kill us! Be afraid! Be very afraid!
So, what is the solution if this theory were to prove correct? Lock down flight travel? Lock down whole countries? Maybe just a regional lock down with entrance and exit points guarded by U.N. peacekeepers? Or maybe we should all simply line up for the jab and get it all over with. A pretty gloomy picture, but it does sell lots of publications and lots of products. And it promotes fear porn. And that, my friends, plays right into the globalists’ hands.

Dirk Müller: Warum sollen wir die Schulden der Ukraine bezahlen? Banken-Stresstest eine Farce

 

24.Oktober 2014:Dirk Müller: Warum sollen wir die Schulden der Ukraine bezahlen? Banken-Stresstest eine Farce.
Cashkurs: http://x2t.com/329056

NEWS AND VIEWS FROM THE NEFARIUM - Death of TOTAL's CEO

 



Joseph talks about the possible murder of Christophe de Margerie, CEO of France's oil giant Total, and this article:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/m...

ISIL Truth and the Suspicious Death of Journalist Serena Shim: Hypocritical Western Media Remains Silent | Global Research

ISIL Truth and the Suspicious Death of Journalist Serena Shim: Hypocritical Western Media Remains Silent | Global Research


serena-shim.si.si
Serena Shim (Screenshot from youtube video by PressTV News Videos)
The suspicious death of US-born journalist Serena Shim, and the deafening silence on the story in the US, is merely the latest example of the blatant double standard employed by the Western media.
Shim, a 29 year old American journalist of Lebanese descent, had been covering the ongoing war in Syria, specifically the current battle between ISIS militants and Kurdish forces near the Syrian town of Kobani, from the Turkish-Syrian border. Shim was traveling in a rental car back to her hotel after reporting from the Turkish town of Suruc near the Syrian border, when the car was allegedly struck by a heavy vehicle, killing Shim.
While Turkish authorities quickly contended that her death was an accident, many around the world, including executives and senior staff members of Press TV – the Iranian news agency for which Shim was working – have expressed doubts about the circumstances of her death, describing it as“suspicious.” Such suspicions are clearly warranted as the alleged accident came just one day after Shim expressed fears for her own safety after receiving death threats from Turkish intelligence (MIT). In an interview with Press TV just after being accused of being a spy and receiving the threats, Shim stated:
“I’m very surprised at this accusation – I even thought of approaching Turkish intelligence because I have nothing to hide… I am a bit worried, because…Turkey has been labeled by Reporters Without Borders as the largest prison for journalists…so I am frightened about what they might use against me… We were some of the first people on the ground –if not the first people – to get that story of…militants going in through the Turkish border…I’ve got images of them in World Food Organization trucks. It was very apparent that they were militants by their beards, by the clothes they wore, and they were going in there with NGO trucks.”
This revealing interview highlights the fact that Shim, unlike many Western journalists reporting on the Syrian conflict, was actually involved in a serious investigation, including documenting the collusion between Turkish intelligence and militant extremists to smuggle fighters and weapons into Syria. While this aspect of the Syrian conflict has been documented by Reuters, the New York Times, and others, Shim was on the ground covering the story, getting documentary evidence including photos and video of the militants in NGO trucks, a blatant violation of international law. It is precisely this damning evidence of Turkey’s involvement in the Syrian war that likely sparked the death threats against her and, quite likely, led to her possible assassination.
Shim’s tragic death has sparked outrage, not to mention tremendous grief, from her family and colleagues who have called for a thorough and impartial investigation into the circumstances of her death. Condolences and expressions of sorrow from around the world have come pouring in to both Press TV and the Shim family. However, quite conspicuously, there has been a near total media blackout in the West, especially in the United States, the country of which Shim was a citizen.
When Are Journalists’ Deaths Newsworthy?
In the wake of Shim’s death and the shameful lack of coverage it has received in the West, disturbing questions emerge as to the attitude of Western media toward the assaults, kidnappings, and killings and/or suspicious deaths of journalists. Specifically, major media outlets and their respective governments and corporate owners must explain why certain journalists’ deaths are international news stories sparking global outrage and serving as the pretexts for military engagement, while others are conveniently swept under the rug, receiving at best a passing mention.
The international outcry over the kidnapping and beheading of James Foley dominated the headlines for weeks, and served as the immediate justification for the US-led airstrikes against ISIS in Syria. Aside from glowing tributes to Foley from nearly every major media organization, and a memorial page dedicated to him and his fans established by Reporters Without Borders, even President Obama spoke of Foley, describing him as “a man who lived his work, who courageously told the stories of his fellow human beings, who was liked and loved by friends and family…We will do everything we can to protect our people and the timeless values that we stand for.” Such high praise coming from the President himself demonstrates the political and social significance of Foley’s death for the US.
And yet, Serena Shim who, like Foley, was a US citizen receives no such coverage. There are no glowing tributes from news organizations, most of which haven’t even bothered to report on her suspicious death. There are few stories even mentioning the incident and, the few that there are, painstakingly attempt to frame the incident as an accident, validating the assertions of Turkish officials, despite there having been no investigation, and the more-than-coincidental death threats she had received just hours before. There has been no public statement as yet from Reporters Without Borders or any other press freedom organization charged with protecting and promoting freedom of the press and the universal protection of journalists. Why? What is the difference between Serena Shim and James Foley that explains the striking disparity in the media coverage and public outcry?

US freelance reporter James Foley (AFP Photo / Nicole Tung)US freelance reporter James Foley (AFP Photo / Nicole Tung)
It’s What You Say and Who You Work For
Serena Shim’s death illustrates quite clearly the double standard applied by Western media and policymakers; Foley’s death was a national tragedy, Shim’s death a mere footnote at best. The inescapable fact is that this disparity is due not to whom they were, but rather who they worked for. Foley was a willing participant in the US-NATO war in Libya, “embedding” himself with the so called“rebels” who, thanks to a massive NATO bombing campaign that effectively destroyed Libyan military capabilities, participated in the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi and the government of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
Foley presented a picture of heroism and self-sacrifice on the part of the rebels, many of whom had direct links to al-Qaeda and global terrorist networks stretching from Afghanistan to Saudi Arabia, portraying them as true patriots liberating their country of a brutal dictator. In effect, Foley was one of the chief propagandists for the NATO operation in Libya, shooting photographs that became central to the image Washington and NATO wanted to portray.
In stark contrast, Shim was working for Iran’s Press TV, a news outlet funded by the Iranian government which provides a counter-narrative to the one presented in the Western media. Press TV’s reportage has been critical of the international operation against Syria, including countless reports, debates, and analysis of the role of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Washington, Tel Aviv, and others in fomenting the war thus far.
Press TV has been deeply critical of US policy vis-à-vis Syria and Iraq, and has presented numerous reports questioning the role of international actors in those conflicts. Shim herself was killed just hours after breaking the news of militant extremists crossing the border into Syria with the assistance of Turkish intelligence, using World Food Program trucks. This bombshell story substantiated the countless other reports dating back to 2012 of Turkish intelligence’s involvement in precisely this sort of operation.
And so, it is clear that the media and government response to the death of journalists directly correlates to the kind of reporting being done. If you are journalist who works for a Western media outlet, and substantiates and propagates the Western narrative, then you are a hero and your death is a national tragedy that elicits a swift response. If, however, you are a journalist who works for a non-Western news organization, and is critical of the West and its policies and actions, then your death is simply not newsworthy and will be quickly forgotten. Such double standards, hypocrisy, and egregious immorality typify Western attitudes towards journalists and the role of the media.
Reuters / Yannis Behrakis
Sadly, Not the First or Last Time
Perhaps the most appalling aspect of this story is the fact that Shim’s death is only the latest in a long line of journalists’ deaths in recent months and years that have been almost entirely ignored by the Western media. From Ukraine to Syria and Gaza, journalists have been killed in alarming numbers while their stories are suppressed in the West.
In Eastern Ukraine, a number of Russian journalists have been assaulted, kidnapped, tortured, and/or killed by the US-backed regime’s military and paramilitary forces. In June 2014, Igor Kornelyuk and Anton Voloshin, both employed by Russia’s Rossiya TV channel, were killed near Lugansk. Despite repeated denials from the Kiev regime regarding the deliberate targeting of journalists, eyewitness accounts from the scene allege that the Russian journalists were specifically targeted by the Ukrainian forces. Viktor Denisov, the surviving member of the news crew, explained, “One hundred percent it was not accidental fire, it was an aimed action from the National Guards’ side.” Despite this eyewitness account, coupled with the shocking footage that Denisov obtained of the attack, there was almost no coverage of the incident in the international press.
Also in June 2014, Anatoly Klyan, a cameraman from Russia’s Channel One television, was killed by forces loyal to the US-backed regime in Kiev. Shot in the stomach while aboard a bus full of mothers of army conscripts that was shelled by Kiev’s military forces, Klyan died before he could make it to a hospital. While there were initial stories covering the incident in the Western media (mostly from British news outlets), there was no international outcry to protect journalists in Ukraine, no heightened scrutiny of the crimes of the Kiev military and paramilitary forces, no pressure exerted on President Poroshenko by his Western backers. One could be forgiven for thinking that the incident was quietly swept under the rug in hopes that it would be forgotten.
In August 2014, Rossiya Segodnya (formerly RIA Novosti) photojournalist Andrey Stenin was killedwhen the car he was travelling in was attacked by Ukrainian forces, along with a number of other cars carrying civilians out of the conflict zone. Stenin was reportedly missing for over a month until it was finally confirmed that he had been killed. While he was believed to have been kidnapped, there were some expressions of support and calls for his release, particularly from the Committee to Protect Journalistswhich has documented a number of crimes committed against journalists, especially Russian journalists, by Ukrainian authorities. However, beyond the professional community, there was decidedly little outcry, especially in the West where news of his disappearance and death went nearly unmentioned.
People walk past a coffin with the body of Russian photojournalist Andrey Stenin during a memorial service in Moscow, September 5, 2014 (Reuters / Sergey Karpukhin)
The deaths of these and other Russian journalists in Ukraine are, sadly, not the only attacks on non-Western journalists. Iran’s Press TV, which is now mourning the loss of Serena Shim, is all too familiar with this story. In September 2012, Press TV’s Damascus correspondent Maya Nasser was killed by a sniper while on air reporting on the attack on the Syrian army’s general staff headquarters. The fact that he was killed by a sniper, an obvious deliberate targeting of a journalist, should have made him a cause célèbre for media organizations around the world. And yet, they remained mostly silent because Nasser was not part of the Western media, and was instead reporting inconvenient facts that disputed the Western narrative of “moderate rebels” fighting against “the brutal dictator Assad.” The obvious lesson here is that journalists are legitimate targets if their reporting runs counter to the agenda of Washington and its allies.
Finally there is the tragic case of Gaza, a veritable killing field for journalists, where at least eight journalists were killed by Israeli forcesduring their war on Gaza in the summer of 2014. While the International Federation of Journalists lodged its formal protest with the United Nations against the targeting of its colleagues, and other organizations such as Al Haq conducted thorough investigations of the incidents, the issue was almost entirely ignored by Western media, especially US media which rather predictably provided a one-sided portrayal of events on the ground in Gaza. While much of the US media uncritically reported from the comfort and safety of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Amman, and other cities, Palestinian journalists were losing their lives to report the horror taking place on the ground in Gaza. The silence from Western media was deafening.
It is critical to reiterate the fact that the Western media, which is always so keen to trumpet its commitment to freedom of the press, among many others, is conspicuously silent on the deaths of colleagues who happen to work for non-Western outlets. It would seem that outrage is more a function of ideology than of genuine support for fellow journalists. In this way, the Western media makes itself complicit in the crimes. By abrogating their responsibility to objectively report the facts, not to mention stand in solidarity with fallen colleagues around the world, the Western media exposes itself as an appendage of the US-NATO imperial system.

Russia buys record chunk of gold in September: 1.2 million ounces

Russia buys record chunk of gold in September: 1.2 million ounces

Chinese miners, meanwhile, are “still on the hunt for global assets”

The race into gold as a dollar alternative continues to build steam, especially with Russia and China.
According to Ed Steer of Casey Research, “Since the 20th of the month fell on a week day, the good folks over at The Central Bank of the Russian Federation updated their website with their September data, including their gold reserve activity. It was a big month for them, as they added a very chunky 1.2 million troy ounces. This is the biggest one-month purchase they've ever made, besting their next biggest addition of 1.1 million ounces back in May of 2010. Russia's Central bank reserves now stand at 37.0 million troy ounces.”
Major miners on the move: Meanwhile, China’s search for gold deposits overseas to bolster its already No. 1 in the world production (at more than 400 tons a year) is ongoing. “Shandong Zhaojin Group Co., one of China’s largest gold producers, is in talks to acquire gold-mining assets in North America and Australia,” The Wall Street Journal reported.
And it’s not alone. “While an avid buyer of domestic assets, Zhaojin has tended to lag behind larger Chinese rivals like China National Gold Corp., Zijin Mining Group Co. and Shandong Gold Group Co. in pursuing foreign acquisitions. Despite recently failed talks on acquiring Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.’s African properties, China National Gold said earlier this year it is also still on the hunt for global assets.”
Shanghai to “rival” London: China’s efforts to gain a greater role in the price-setting mechanisms in the gold market, as well as offer new ways for global and domestic buyers to invest, also are advancing. “The Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) is working on plans for China's first forwards and options in gold, sources say, potentially putting China ahead in the race to set an Asian pricing benchmark that might eventually rival the London gold fix,” according to Reuters.
"We are eyeing the launch of gold forwards in the next six months to a year on the international board," said a senior source at the Shanghai exchange.
While Western media trip over themselves to dismiss gold as an obsolete investment, America’s biggest economic and military rivals in the 21st century and doing everything they can to acquire and control more and more of this strategic precious metal. Ignore these moves on the geopolitical chessboard at your own peril.

China's Secret Moon Mission - SpaceDaily

China's Secret Moon Mission

by Morris JonesSydney, Australia (SPX) Oct 23, 2014



illustration only
Soon, a rocket will launch a Chinese spacecraft to the Moon and back. It's the first time that China has attempted this long and perilous journey. It should be a great achievement for the nation, worthy of extensive publicity. Ironically, this mission has been shrouded in more obscurity than the "secret" X-37B spaceplane operated by the US Air Force, which even had its re-entry pre-announced and covered extensively on video.
It would seem that Chinese President Xi Jinping is tightening the screws on "state secrets" even more than he did in the past. Censorship of China's space program increased soon after he took office, and the situation seems to have deteriorated even further. But there could be other reasons why this specific mission is being treated with such caution by China's state media.
Let's get through some technical details. The spacecraft will probably not enter orbit around the Moon, despite precise statements made in the Chinese media that previously suggested this. It's flying a free-return trajectory that should take slightly over a week to return home.
The capsule to be used in this mission is a scale model of the descent module used on the Shenzhou astronaut-carrying spacecraft. The "service module" for the spacecraft is a boxy satellite bus based on the Chang'e lunar orbiter design. The spacecraft will be launched by a Long March 3C rocket, similar to the one used for the last Chang'e orbiter launch.
The lack of discussion hints at a sensitive agenda for the mission. Officially, this is a test of a capsule to be used in a future robot sample-return mission to the Moon. China has made no secret of its plans to fly two such missions within a decade. But the type of capsule used in this mission is suspicious. Why does it have to be a replica of China's astronaut capsule?
This analyst feels that the mission is yet further evidence of plans for launching Chinese astronauts to the Moon in the future. The first astronauts to be launched there will probably fly a circumlunar trajectory, similar to this mission.
They will not land on the Moon and they will not even orbit the Moon. But they will go to the Moon and back. That's something America hasn't done in more than 40 years, and something Russia has never done at all. The propaganda value of such a mission would be enormous!
Let's see how China deals with this increasingly enigmatic space mission. There's more going on than a cursory glance would suggest!
Dr Morris Jones is an Australian space analyst who has written for spacedaily.com since 1999. Email morrisjonesNOSPAMhotmail.com. Replace NOSPAM with @ to send email. Dr Jones will answer media inquiries.

Merkel: EU-Steuerzahler sollen Gas-Schulden der Ukraine finanzieren | DEUTSCHE WIRTSCHAFTS NACHRICHTEN

Merkel: EU-Steuerzahler sollen Gas-Schulden der Ukraine finanzieren | DEUTSCHE WIRTSCHAFTS NACHRICHTEN

Die EU-Steuerzahler befinden sich nach Auffassung von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel in einer „Solidaritätsgemeinschaft“ mit der Ukraine. Weil Russland „aus guten Gründen“ die Bezahlung seiner Rechnungen erwarte, müsse die EU eine „Brückenfinanzierung“ übernehmen. Später könne der IWF die Rechnungen übernehmen.

Die EU versteht sich als eine große Familie, weshalb es Angela Merkel ein Gebot der Solidarität erscheint, dass die europäischen Steuerzahler die Gasrechnungen der Ukraine bezahlt. (Foto: dpa)
Die EU versteht sich als eine große Familie, weshalb es Angela Merkel ein Gebot der Solidarität erscheint, dass die europäischen Steuerzahler die Gasrechnungen der Ukraine bezahlt. (Foto: dpa)
Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel hat am Freitag beim EU-Gipfel vorgeschlagen, die EU solle die Bezahlung der Gasschulden der Ukraine an Russland übernehmen. “Es gibt eine Notwendigkeit einer gewissen Brückenfinanzierung”, sagte Merkel in Brüssel. Forderungen etwa Italiens nach einer Lockerung der Sanktionen gegen Russland erteilten die EU-Staats- und Regierungschefs eine klare Absage.

Merkel betonte, dass die Finanzierung der russischen Gaslieferungen an die Ukraine von November bis Februar sichergestellt werden müsse. Dann werde die Ukraine vom Internationalen Währungsfonds ein neues Programm erhalten, an dass sich auch eine neue finanzielle Förderung der EU anschließen werde. Russland erwarte aber “mit guten Gründen”, dass es schon früher Geld für das gelieferte Gas an die Ukraine erhält.
Bei den Gesprächen von EU-Energiekommissar Günther Oettinger mit der Ukraine und Russland kommenden Mittwoch würden verschiedene Konzepte für eine solche Brückenfinanzierung auf dem Tisch liegen, sagte Merkel. “Wir sind hier in einer Solidaritätsgemeinschaft”, sagte die Kanzlerin mit Blick darauf, dass die Unterbrechung der russischen Gaslieferungen durch die Ukraine auch Westeuropa treffen könnte. Die Ukraine hat die EU bereits um finanzielle Hilfe gebeten.
Die EU will die von den Separatisten in der Ostukraine geplanten Wahlen auf keinen Fall anerkennen. “Die Abhaltung von ‘Präsidentschafts-‘ und ‘Parlamentswahlen’, zu denen die selbsternannten Behörden aufgerufen haben, würde nach Auffassung des Europäischen Rates gegen den Buchstaben und Geist des Protokolls von Minsk verstoßen und wird nicht anerkannt werden”, heißt es in der Gipfelerklärung, auf die sich die 28 EU-Regierungen geeinigt haben. Die Wahlen würden nicht anerkannt. Zugleich begrüßte die EU die ukrainische Parlamentswahlen, die für Sonntag angesetzt sind.
In dem Minsker Abkommen hatten sich Russland, die Ukraine und die Separatisten zu Wahlen nach ukrainischem Recht im ganzen Land verpflichtet. Die Separatisten verhindern aber Parlamentswahlen in den von ihnen kontrollierten Gebieten. Die EU fordert Russland zudem auf, einen stärkeren Beitrag zur Stabilisierung der Ukraine zu leisten. Russland müsse Einfluss auf die Separatisten ausüben, damit diese den vereinbarten Waffenstillstand einhalten. Zudem sei immer noch keine Kontrolle der ukrainisch-russischen Grenze möglich. “Deshalb sehen wir keine Möglichkeit, über die Aufhebung der Sanktionen zu sprechen”, sagte Merkel mit Blick auf die EU-Sanktionen gegen Russland.
In Deutschland hält unterdessen die Debatte über den richtigen Umgang mit Russland an. Der Chef des deutsch-russischen Forums, Matthias Platzeck, sprach sich im Handelsblatt dafür aus, mit Russlands Präsidenten Wladimir Putin einen Kompromiss über die im März annektierte ukrainische Halbinsel Krim anzustreben. Platzeck schlug ein neues Referendum, eine Entschädigung für die Ukraine oder die Kombination von beidem von beidem vor.

Lost Ancient High Technology Of Egypt: The 1200 Ton Obelisk

 



http://www.hiddenincatours.com
One of the most amazing and least understood attempted achievements of ancient Egypt is the 1200 ton unfinished obelisk located in the Aswan quarry.
The dynastic people could not have shaped this huge stone, due to its size and hardness, and there is ample evidence that they tried to cut it into smaller pieces, unsuccessfully.
Come with us March 8 to 21, 2015, and see it for yourself:
http://khemitology.com/wp-content/upl...

"Why I Will Not Submit To Medical Martial Law" | Zero Hedge

"Why I Will Not Submit To Medical Martial Law" | Zero Hedge

One of the most dangerous philosophical contentions even amongst liberty movement activists is the conundrum of government force and prevention during times of imminent pandemic. All of us at one time or another have had this debate. If a legitimate viral threat existed and threatened to infect and kill millions of Americans, is it then acceptable for the government to step in, remove civil liberties, enforce quarantines, and stop people from spreading the disease? After all, during a viral event, the decisions of each individual can truly have a positive or negative effect on the rest of society, right? One out of control (or “lone wolf”) citizen/terrorist could reignite a biological firestorm, so, should we not turn to government and forgo certain freedoms in order to achieve the greater good for the greater number?
If the government in question was a proven and honorable institution, then I would say pro-Medical Martial Law arguments might have a leg to stand on. However, this is not the case. In my view, medical martial law is absolutely unacceptable under ANY circumstances, including Ebola, in light of the fact that our current government will be the predominant cause of viral outbreak. That is to say, you DO NOT turn to the government for help when the government is the cause of the problem.
The recent rise of global Ebola is slowly bringing the issue of medical martial law to the forefront of our culture. Charles Krauthammer at The Washington Post recently argued in favor of possible restrictions on individual and Constitutional liberties in the face of a viral pandemic threat.
The CDC now argues that in the case of people who may be potential carriers, or even in the case of people who refuse to undergo screenings, it has the legal authority to dissolve all constitutional protections and essentially imprison (quarantine) an American citizen for as long as they see fit to do so.
The Obama Administration is now using militant terminology in reference to Ebola response, including the formation of “Ebola SWAT Teams” for quick reaction to potential outbreak areas.
In typical socialist fashion, the nurses union 'National Nurses United' has called for Barack Obama to use “executive authority” to take control of all Ebola response protocols in hospitals across the country. Yet another perpetuation of the myth that more government power is the solution.
And finally, the Department of Defense has been tasked to create a military controlled “quick-strike team” to deal with Ebola within U.S. borders. This team will be under the command of none other than Northcom, apparently trampling the Posse Comitatus Act and setting the stage for the rationalized use of military personnel against U.S. citizens under the guise of pandemic prevention.
It should be clear to anyone with half a brain that medical martial law is being quietly prepared, and that the threat of such measures is not a paranoid conspiracy, but a very real possibility. It should also be noted that such provisions are not only the products of the Obama Administration. It was George W. Bush who first created laws intersecting with theWorld Health Organization's pandemic preparedness planning. These laws include the “overrule of existing legislation or (individual) human rights” in order to quell a viral outbreak, and were originally drafted around the potential of an influenza crisis.
It is this kind of executive overreach that has set precedence for states such as Connecticut toannounce a tentative state of emergency with medical martial law restrictions.
I discussed in great detail why Ebola works in favor of establishment elites in my article 'An Ebola Outbreak Would Be Advantageous For Globalists'.
Understand that bureaucrats will come to you with promises of offering a helping hand, hoping that you are afraid enough to accept, but their intentions will not be compassionate. Rather, their intent will be to assert as much dominance over the public as possible during the chaos, and to erase any conception the people may have had in the past that they have inalienable rights.
But going beyond the hidden motives of tyrants, I think it is important to point out that the Center for Disease Control and the federal government in general has already lost all credibility in dealing with Ebola, and therefore, it has lost any authority it may have had in administrating a future response.
Ebola has been officially known to the CDC for over thirty years. Why has the CDC refused for three decades to produce proper care guidelines for hospitals? Medical staff in the U.S. didn't even receive guidelines when the outbreak in Western Africa was obviously progressing out of control.
Why did the CDC leave Thomas Duncan, the very first U.S. Ebola case, in the hands of the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, without proper procedures in place to prevent further infection, and without a CDC team present? The CDC has an annual budget of nearly $7 billion. Where is all of this money going if not to stamp out such threats as Ebola?
The argument presented by the White House, the CDC, and even the World Bank, has been that stopping direct or indirect travel from nations with an Ebola outbreak would be “impractical”, and that such travel bans would somehow “make matters worse”. They have yet to produce a logical explanation as to how this makes sense, but what if we did not need to institute a travel ban? The CDC, with it's massive budget, could easily establish quarantine measures in infected countries. Anyone wishing to travel outside of these nations would be welcome to do so, as long as they voluntarily participate in quarantine procedures for a set number of days. No quarantine, no plane ticket. Where has the CDC response been in Western Africa?
Why not use minor and measured travel restriction in Africa today, instead of using unprecedented martial law in America tomorrow? It makes no sense, unless, of course, the plan is to allow Ebola to spread...
Why has the White House nominated Ron Klain, a man who knows absolutely NOTHING about Ebola or medical emergency strategies, as the new “Ebola Czar”?
Why has all discussion on Ebola prevention revolved around government measures rather than community measures?  Why has all talk centered on what the government will do AFTER an outbreak occurs, rather than on what can be done to prevent an outbreak in the first place?
The reality is that the federal government does not have any treatments for Ebola that are outside of the knowledge and capabilities of the average medically trained citizen. Meaning, the government and the CDC are NOT needed for a community to handle an Ebola outbreak, if that community is given proper guidelines and strategies in advance. Treatment for Ebola, at least in first world nations, consists primarily of regimented transfusions. These transfusions are a mixture of isotonic saline, electrolytes, and plasma, designed to keep the body supported until it's immune system can build up a proper defense to the virus. Natural and homeopathic methods can also boost immune system functions making the body resistant to the virus before it is ever contracted. The most effective of all treatments appears to be thetransfusion of blood from a recovering patient with anti-bodies into a newly sick patient. This is likely the reason for the quick recovery of infected doctors like Kent Brantly.
The CDC would never be able to coherently organize a large scale program of transfusion initiatives, even if it wanted to. Most hospitals around the country have no isolation wards able to handle even a minor Ebola outbreak. The hospitals that do have facilities are limited to less than a dozen beds. According to the medical workers I have spoken with, most hospitals require a minimum of around 50 health professionals to deal with a single Ebola patient.  In the event of an outbreak larger than a few people per state, the CDC and local hospitals are simply not equipped to react to the problem.  Blood transfusions from recovering donors would be few and far between, unless organized by local citizens working under their own directives.
Ironically, it was the Bush Administration's own report in 2006 on the possibility of bird flu pandemic that admitted the government is completely unequipped to handle an outbreak of moderate size. The report stated that “all sources of external aid may be compromised during a pandemic,” and that "local communities will have to address the medical and non-medical effects of the pandemic with available resources." Little has changed in the federal government's pandemic preparations since the report was written.
This leaves individual communities to either prepare for the worst, or die off while waiting for the government to save them. Self isolation and self treatment are the only practical options.
The greatest danger to American citizens is, in fact, not the Ebola virus, but government reactions to the Ebola virus. Already, several medical outfits around the world are suddenly interested in producing an Ebola vaccination when no one seemed very interested before. This might sound like good news, until you learn the terrible history of modern vaccinations.
Pharmaceutical company Merck was caught red handed faking vaccine efficacy data. Merck's Gardisil was found to contain DNA fragments of human papillomavirus.
Glaxosmithkline, a major vaccine producer, has been caught repeatedly attempting to bribe doctors and health professionals into promoting their products or outright lying about their effectiveness. Glaxo was caught producing rotavirus vaccinations tainted with a swine virus in 2010. Glaxo has been caught producing vaccines tainted with bacteria and endotoxins.
It is important to point out that Glaxo is also spearheading an Ebola vaccine initiative.
U.S. company Baxter produced a flu vaccination in Austria tainted with both avian flu and swine flu. The mixture just happened to be randomly tested on a group of ferrets by a lab in the Czech Republic. The test animals died. The exposure of this “mix up” was quietly swept under the rug by Baxter and the mainstream media, but reports indicate that if the vaccine had been used on the general population, a terrible pandemic would have erupted.
Beyond the fact that vaccinations have a tendency to cripple our natural immune system and infect patients with the very disease they are meant to prevent, none of these existing companies can be trusted to produce a vaccine that is safe even by traditional pharmaceutical standards (which are very low). If the CDC and the federal government trigger a medical martial law scenario, they will most likely include forced vaccination of the population to maintain “herd immunity”. The bottom line? The use of such vaccines will be a death sentence for many, a death more certain than the contraction of Ebola. In my opinion, Ebola vaccination should be avoided at all costs by the American populace.
I can think of no rationale for government involvement in the treatment of an Ebola outbreak. If it is not pure incompetence on their part that has exacerbated the threat, then even worse, it is a deliberate program of genocide. In either case, no military or CDC “strike teams” should be allowed free reign in our neighborhoods, towns, counties, or states. DHS and FEMA Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) are also a no go, given FEMA's track record of dismal disaster response. They CANNOT be allowed to take control of our communities.
The only way for Americans to survive such an event is to cut out government entirely and establish their own medical strategies, as organizations like the Oath Keepers Community Preparedness Teams (CPT) are doing.
If someone wants to voluntarily go to the CDC or FEMA for assistance, then they should be allowed to take that risk. However, medical martial law over all of us in the name of the “greater good” should not be tolerated. The government has proven beyond a doubt that it is not qualified to handle a viral crisis scenario, let alone determine what the “greater good” actually is. I can't speak for the whole of the Liberty Movement, but as for myself, if a group of hazmat suited thugs decides to chase me down with a syringe, I am relatively certain none of them will live through the encounter.
Will I be accused of aiding the spread of Ebola because of my non-compliance? Of course. Do I care? Not so much. Each individual American will have to make their own decision on this matter in due course. Is it better to conform and risk annihilation at the hands of an ignorant and/or corrupt government, or, to fight back and be labeled a bio-terrorist? With the clear lack of tangible government preventions for outbreak in the U.S., you'll probably get your chance to find out soon enough.